Message Area
Casually read the BBS message area using an easy to use interface. Messages are categorized exactly like they are on the BBS. You may post new messages or reply to existing messages! You are not logged in. Login here for full access privileges. |
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Linux operating system (OS), a U... <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
|
||||||
From | To | Subject | Date/Time | |||
Nelgin | Alexey Vissarionov | Re: Alternative(s) to ipset on OpenVZ |
December 20, 2017 7:30 PM * |
|||
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 07:00:00 +0300, "Alexey Vissarionov" <alexey.vissarionov@2:5020/545> wrote: >Good ${greeting_time}, Joaquim! > >18 Dec 2017 21:40:18, you wrote to me: > > av>> Very dangerous thing... However, it makes some fun to > av>> use it against the admin^Widiot who installed it :-) > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > JH> I'm curious ... why is fail2ban dangerous? > >Didn't you read the message before answering it? > >https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?nam... >and some others discovered since that. Is it an accident that you omitted to say that there were only 3 CVE announcements since CVE-2012-5642 and those were over 4 years ago or are you just scaremongering? The only options you offer are to block CIDR (which can be done manully after fail2ban picks up some common CIDRS worth blocking) and rate limiting which fail2ban does by way of blocking anyway. --- SBBSecho 3.03-Linux * Origin: End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com (1:124/5016) |
||||||
|
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Linux operating system (OS), a U... <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
Execution Time: 0.0964 seconds If you experience any problems with this website or need help, contact the webmaster. VADV-PHP Copyright © 2002-2024 Steve Winn, Aspect Technologies. All Rights Reserved. Virtual Advanced Copyright © 1995-1997 Roland De Graaf. |