Message Area
Casually read the BBS message area using an easy to use interface. Messages are categorized exactly like they are on the BBS. You may post new messages or reply to existing messages! You are not logged in. Login here for full access privileges. |
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Discussion about the Internet. <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
|
||||||
From | To | Subject | Date/Time | |||
Bbsing Bbs | All | Re: is the main stream in |
August 17, 2017 6:04 AM * |
|||
I will try not to get to far out there with my update to this echo, but its not easy. Again thanks to everyone who is taking interest in this topic, I think its a great topic and maybe it can generate and inspire innovate thoughts for some problems with the current internet, the information age, and how to continue to enable everyone to be more free with information sharing and obtaining. I really wanted to reply to some of you because all of your thoughts are good. I even find the argument about this echo a nice addition to the general problem with the current internet. Because this echo has a number of responses Its really difficult to quote each one and highlight some of the things I found pretty interesting. I'm not that good with echo mail yet. I also didn't really want this to be about a debate be rather get a census for current ideas and thoughts related to if I'm the only person out there who things the current internet, search engines, social media is really dumbing down the public who is using it. I don't use most of social media, evident by my post here and no other place. I think the current political and corporate climate is not safe to post ones thoughts generally. In addition the idea posts becoming immortal within the internet and used to evaluate individuals based on current and emerging trends doesn't lend well to candid or constructive views. Examples are where you post anything about a fun night you had out could impact your ability to be promoted. Or CNN will come look for you and start a campaign to make your current and future life and ability to advance your lot in life a nightmare or impossible. With this thought in mind I don't believe the information age as arrived nor do I believe the current internet was meant to be as it it. The folks at CERN had a different idea compared to global commerce, but those in the commerce and banking industry found the internet an efficient means to move information. I had some thoughts to add to all of yours. 1. we all have an opportunity to make the internet a better place. As some have pointed out the internet is what you look for. 2. I really think talking about the internet not just the small % of it we see available via major search engines but additionally those parts that are not available. I also wanted to highlight some aspects of availability, access to, and presentation. availability is a huge aspect of information that will be consumed generally. I find this similar to schools teaching our children. Its not really the fault of the ignorant that they are ignorant Those who are not have a general responsibility under society's egalitarian hope, with solidarity to guide those that are ignorant. Not for the benefit of literate but for the benefit of both literate and ignorant. There is a mutual benefit. Often corporations and governments see this as consent to benefits in a way where those receiving should pay, or give more than they receive so govs and corps can profit and transfer wealth from the masses by any means possible. Good and valid information should be available and easy to find This really makes all the difference in the world. Those in North Korea with there 26 websites vetted by their government have little to no chances as responsible ignorants of finding and obtaining valid information to enhance their or anyone elses lives. Our youths in poor public schools have less opportunity based on terrible educations compared with those in rich affluent regions access; without it no way anyone can use the information if it did exist. Here we see this often. In America many research initiatives are funded via tax/government assistance. These are things like cancer research, many scientific research initiatives all become unavailable to the general public; even though, the public paid for it or a portion of it. Although with $$$ an individual can obtain such information but generally no. presentation; this is where things like yahoo.com and google.com generally present a small % of the internet to the mass public. here is where you search for things and those who have accounts with google and other search providers show up at the top of the search results. This is how the shopping from google starts , now I realize this isn't for every search result. The other interesting fact from presentation is how malware is injected from paid advertisements that show at the top of the hit list via banner adds and other forms that internet criminal organi- zations pay to google and google and other major providers help perpetrate cyber-crime against its users. If I present 1 beer (budwiser) day and night to you, when some person says lets get beer the first thing you will think is budwiser. This is the concept that presentation guides and creates markets that may not have existed before. If I offer something I can create main channel markets and sub channel profits. This is exactly what has occurred with gmail and why there are large class action suites against google and yahoo. In part this is a sub channel market that the legal demographic is tapping into, those firms will make mass $$ compared to those who were hurt by the actions of the primary market. Now I thought I would address more related to responsibility of the users of the internet. Because I feel this goes in 2 directions I believe people have a responsibility to not just do what they can, but do what they should. Part of that is about providing valid information. I can't recall how many cancer cures I've seen that appear absolutely ludicrous or coconut oil for vaginal health, and a myriad of things that are virtually impossible for the general person to disprove or research for utter lack of a lifetime at the computer and the lack of a research group. People have a responsibility to provide valid information not for making money but for providing information to people for the good of everyone. The current trend is for commerce. People think how to make money at youtube. Look up a video and what do you hear, ??? don't forget to subscribe, and like, and share, ...etc. Solicitations for commercial generation. The internet for free information should and could be free. Take the FDA stance on sugar being healthy based on lobbyist that causes a mass epidemic world wide. The sugar industry isn't forcing people in general to eat sugar per say but propaganda combined with government support has degraded the health of millions, whereas if the sugar industry not only produced their government backed studies on the subject and had unbiased scientific information without profits in mind, and why federally funded info isn't available. These aspects are the concepts that govern the control of information within the current mainstream internet based on the laws of the current technology. The visible controls shrouded in legalsleeze are what is binding people to stupidity and driving them towards a consumer age never seen before, compared with genesis and intent of the internet; information age. Difference is the hunters vs the hunted, we are the hunted and not being equipped to be hunters. private data mined that is provided by the people is studied and although that information you are providing is no longer yours, permanent, and used against you to create psychological hooks for you to continue to provide information and pay for consumption, based on EULA and other laws. I think some of these things we are talking about highlight some causes of the dumbing down of information to continuously create a desire to consume entertainment and anything easily persuade general public to spend money and provide nothing of value, and if value in information is provided its quickly disputed or perceived to be invalid to maintain the focus on spending money and having people provided feed back for corporates to understand how to get every person to continue to consume their products, weather its healthy for consumers or not. Things like distributed computing mentioned by others is such a great example of reshaping the internet and with that thought in mind allows people to start redefining search engines and capabilities that take the power from a single person or corporation and put it into the hands of the people, at least until someone or some government tries to usurp it. ... ...::comptech power up::... bbsing(: --- SBBSecho 3.01-Linux * Origin: Electronic Warfare BBS | telnet:\\bbs.ewbbs.net (1:227/201) |
||||||
|
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Discussion about the Internet. <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
Execution Time: 0.1129 seconds If you experience any problems with this website or need help, contact the webmaster. VADV-PHP Copyright © 2002-2024 Steve Winn, Aspect Technologies. All Rights Reserved. Virtual Advanced Copyright © 1995-1997 Roland De Graaf. |