Hello Wilfred,

On Fri Dec 23 2016 18:46:56, Wilfred van Velzen wrote to Nicholas Boel:

 NB>> Why? The point was that the last time I compiled, those warnings
 NB>> weren't there. Since there were some recent updates to the code,
 NB>> I decided to compile again and report the massive amounts of
 NB>> warnings, in case someone wants to fix them.

 WV> Did your gcc version change since the last time? Because not that much
 WV> has changed in the golded code in the last couple of years?

I don't believe it had changed. The last time I believe I compiled was in
November, and now just recently to get the latest HMB updates you sent patches
for. So maybe it had something to do with that?

 WV> Btw: I noticed them too, when I compiled the golded code this week.

Using what version of gcc? At least it's nice to know it's not specific to my
system. But the possibility of it being both Golded and/or gcc are still there.

 WV> But there were just too many, otherwise I might have taken a look at
 WV> the source code that caused them. 

That's why I said something. There were so many I actually figured it would
eventually fail - and was quite surprised that it didn't.

Regards,
Nick

... "Не знаю. Я здесь только работаю."
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20161221
 * Origin: thePharcyde_ distribution system (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)