Message Area
Casually read the BBS message area using an easy to use interface. Messages are categorized exactly like they are on the BBS. You may post new messages or reply to existing messages! You are not logged in. Login here for full access privileges. |
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to FMAIL SUPPORT <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
|
||||||
From | To | Subject | Date/Time | |||
Wilfred van Velzen | Paul Quinn | Re: FMail-lnx32-2.1.0.18-Beta20170905 netmail Pack |
January 10, 2018 9:42 AM * |
|||
Hi Paul, On 10 Jan 18 12:25, Paul Quinn wrote to Wilfred van Velzen: about: "FMail-lnx32-2.1.0.18-Beta20170905 netmail Pack": PQ> That worked beautifully. OTOH, the pack manager's handling of FMAil's PQ> response caught me by surprise, with... >> 09 Jan 18 09:03:21 FMAIL FMail-lnx32-2.1.0.18-Beta20170905 - Pack -C >> 09 Jan 18 09:03:21 FMAIL Warning: Node 3:640/384.125 is not defined in >> the node manager >> 09 Jan 18 09:03:21 FMAIL Message #1 : 3:640/1384 -> 3:640/384.125 >> 09 Jan 18 09:03:21 FMAIL Create >> /opt/ftn/fido/outbound/02800180.pnt/0000007d.flo >> 09 Jan 18 09:03:21 FMAIL Sending new mail from 3:640/1384 to >> 3:640/384.125 >> 09 Jan 18 09:03:21 FMAIL Netmail: 1, Personal: 0, Hudson: 0, JAMbase: >> 0 >> 09 Jan 18 09:03:21 FMAIL Msgbase net: 0, echo: 0, dup: 0, bad: 0 >> 09 Jan 18 09:03:21 FMAIL Pack Active: 0.0062 sec. PQ> Since I didn't have a 'node' setting in binkD for the point, it meant the PQ> mail packet just got hung up (the default binkD ~binkp.net addressing PQ> wouldn't work as it's a point, and therefore not available from the WAN PQ> side). PQ> To my way of thinking it shouldn't have happened. The pack manager's PQ> routing is defined as... PQ> 9. 3:640/* via 3:640/384 PQ> 10. 1:* 2:* 3:* 4:* 5:* 6:* via 3:640/384 PQ> (The other 8 entries deal with other zones & regions.) PQ> So, I'm wondering what I might need to add to the routing table in the PQ> event of further "ping" queries, especially from other 'unknown' nodes? PQ> Did the "Pack -C" statement have any bearing? It might be due to the -C indeed. Although PING replies shouldn't have the Crash flag (I think), so shouldn't be touched by 'Pack -C'. But doing 'Pack -C' the right way is a bit odd: The syntax of FMail Pack: FMail Pack [ <node>... [EXCEPT <node>...] [VIA <node>|HOST] [/A] [/C] [/H] [/I] [/L] [/O] ] So if you specify -C you _must_ specify the <node>, otherwise the behaviour is undefined. What I do in my pack script is something like: $BIN/fmail pack 2>&1 | tee -a $LOG ... $BIN/fmail pack '*' '-c' 2>&1 | tee -a $LOG So pack routed netmail first, and then handle the unsend crash mail that is left in my netmail folder. Wilfred. --- FMail-W32 2.0.1.4 * Origin: point@work (2:280/464.112) |
||||||
|
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to FMAIL SUPPORT <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
Execution Time: 0.0849 seconds If you experience any problems with this website or need help, contact the webmaster. VADV-PHP Copyright © 2002-2024 Steve Winn, Aspect Technologies. All Rights Reserved. Virtual Advanced Copyright © 1995-1997 Roland De Graaf. |