Message Area
Casually read the BBS message area using an easy to use interface. Messages are categorized exactly like they are on the BBS. You may post new messages or reply to existing messages! You are not logged in. Login here for full access privileges. |
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to FMAIL SUPPORT <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
|
||||||
From | To | Subject | Date/Time | |||
Wilfred van Velzen | Paul Quinn | Re: Trialing FMail/lnx status check-in |
September 7, 2017 1:51 PM * |
|||
Hi Paul, On 2017-09-07 21:47:00, you wrote to me: WvV>> Maybe the loging/printing isn't perfect, but this all WvV>> seems fine. Have you checked if the mail arrived at it's WvV>> destination (3:640/384) ? PQ> Maybe so. They were only test posts within a 'sandbox'. OTOH, I've just PQ> now checked the mail bundle with David Nugent's 'InspectA' util, and found PQ> the posts were written properly. Ok, nice! PQ> Even the TZUTC values were correct. That's put there by golded! Only ftools generates TZUTC kludges when you use the 'post' function. WvV>> If you are not certain you can have FMail make backups of WvV>> outgoing .pkt files by specifying a "Outgoing backup" WvV>> directory in FConfig. So you have a way of checking what's WvV>> produced without it disappearing because of your mailer WvV>> (or other processes) doing their jobs... PQ> I used to when I first started toying with FMail/lnx, but soon turned that PQ> off. They're effectively being backup up for the duration of the testing PQ> phase by not being sent anywhere. They're boxed in as if "lab rats". That also works. Bye, Wilfred. --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815 * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464) |
||||||
|
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to FMAIL SUPPORT <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
Execution Time: 0.0848 seconds If you experience any problems with this website or need help, contact the webmaster. VADV-PHP Copyright © 2002-2024 Steve Winn, Aspect Technologies. All Rights Reserved. Virtual Advanced Copyright © 1995-1997 Roland De Graaf. |