Hi Nicholas,

On 27 Jul 17 15:35, Nicholas Boel wrote to Wilfred van Velzen:
  about: "Status check":

 WvV>> Can you give an exampleof "Intel specific code"? I'm still wondering
 WvV>> what you mean by that exactly. 

 NB> The Usurper sources are at usurper.info. Take a look for yourself, as I'm
 NB> not a coder but there were plenty of lines with "intel" directly in the
 NB> code. That's all I can really do to describe it.

I've looked at the latest release 0.24 source code from 2 years ago, and the
pre-release version. They have exactly 1 line with 'intel':

{$asmmode intel}

(And I'm not sure what that does exactly.)

The 0.23f and 0.20e (I haven't looked at all the versions inbetween). They have
 none.

Anyway, this is pascal, you can't really compare that with the C sources of
FMail!

The original code of FMail did however contain some assembler code, which of
course is intel specific, and DOS specific interrupt calls. They have all been
removed in the past 10 years since I took over from Folkert.

 WvV>> It's probably the lack of memory. Didn't you say it "only" has 256
 WvV>> MB? 

 NB> 128mb storage on a microSD card, but 2gb ram with a quad core processor.

128mb? Do they still make them that small? 


Wilfred.

--- FMail-W32 2.0.1.4
 * Origin:  point@work  (2:280/464.112)