Message Area
Casually read the BBS message area using an easy to use interface. Messages are categorized exactly like they are on the BBS. You may post new messages or reply to existing messages! You are not logged in. Login here for full access privileges. |
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to General discussion on Husky Soft... <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
|
||||||
From | To | Subject | Date/Time | |||
Nicholas Boel | All | Question.. |
December 15, 2016 9:03 AM * |
|||
Hello All, On 14 Dec 16 09:48, Nicholas Boel wrote to All: NB> Just have a couple questions regarding some configuration options in NB> fidoconfig: NB> 1) When using "hpt pack" sometimes it seems to mark recently written NB> echomail messages with the "Snt" flag, whether or not NB> "PackNetmailOnScan" is set anywhere (even though that would be reverse NB> from what seems to be happening here, so shouldn't matter anyways). This is still puzzling to me, but.. NB> 2) ProcessPkt - Can (or should) this be used for processing Filefix NB> requests? As of right now, I have a script executed from binkd called NB> poll.sh that runs: NB> /usr/local/bin/hpt toss link NB> /usr/local/bin/hpt ffix! NB> /usr/local/bin/hpt pack I have shortened this process by using "/usr/local/bin/hpt scan -f" together with "PackNetmailOnScan yes" in my config. At least now if echoscan.log (what I use for "echotosslog", since it's actually misrepresented. "importlog" should be echotoss.log) is not there it will stop and do nothing. NB> Which seems to work fine, but if ProcessPkt can be used to run NB> "/usr/local/bin/hpt ffix!" I may not need it in my polling script, and NB> could just run "hpt toss link" directly. Still wonder if this is a possibility. NB> Also, feature request: When "hpt ffix[!]" actually does process a NB> filefix request, can we have an option to automatically pack the NB> netmail replies? This would save time and resources on running "hpt NB> pack" every time when it is not needed most of the time. This would or NB> could somewhat mimic the "Areafix requests on the fly" method. NB> htick.texi seems to say "Filefix requests on the fly" but the same NB> options areafix has are not available for filefix (ie: AreafixFromPkt NB> is available, while FilefixFromPkt is not an option). NB> With the feature request, then the need/want for ProcessPkt wouldn't NB> be necessary. NB> Thank you in advance. I'm going to assume this echo is more or less the Z1 version; with a couple of courageous Z2 fellas connected to it, as I've seen cross posts to other echos regarding the Husky software. If someone has a link to the others, I'm interested in receiving them as well. Regards, Nick ... "Не знаю. Я здесь только работаю." --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20160827 * Origin: thePharcyde_ distribution system (Wisconsin) (1:154/10) |
||||||
|
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to General discussion on Husky Soft... <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
Execution Time: 0.0807 seconds If you experience any problems with this website or need help, contact the webmaster. VADV-PHP Copyright © 2002-2024 Steve Winn, Aspect Technologies. All Rights Reserved. Virtual Advanced Copyright © 1995-1997 Roland De Graaf. |