Message Area
Casually read the BBS message area using an easy to use interface. Messages are categorized exactly like they are on the BBS. You may post new messages or reply to existing messages! You are not logged in. Login here for full access privileges. |
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Politics Unlimited <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
|
||||||
From | To | Subject | Date/Time | |||
Lee Lofaso | Gregory Deyss | War or Planefuls of |
July 20, 2019 1:55 AM * |
|||
Hello Greg, >LL>Donald Trump Jr has met with Russians at Trump Tower. This >LL>was a scandal, but not necessarily a crime. Even though it is >LL>known that several Russians were involved in trying to disrupt >LL>our elections. > >What the story is: The Russian babe Natalia Veselnitskaya was said to have >dirt on Hillary, but when they met at Trump tower all she wanted to talk > about was about a Russian Adoption from a Russian orphanage of which is > dclearly not irt on Hillary Clinton. > >Source Factcheck.org >https://www.factcheck.org/2018/06/a-timeline-... > The real story can be found in the Mueller report. Have you read it yet? >July 8, 2017 The New York Times reports on the Trump campaign meeting with >Veselnitskaya, who was described by the paper as a Russian lawyer who has >connections to the Kremlin. Donald Trump Jr., in a statement to the Times, >downplays the meeting, saying that the participants primarily discussed a >program about the adoption of Russian children. The statement makes no > mention that he was promised damaging information about Clinton. The NYT is not the Mueller report. Want to try again? >July 9, 2017 In a second story, the Times reports that Donald Trump Jr. was >promised damaging information about Hillary Clinton before agreeing to meet >with a Kremlin-connected Russian lawyer during the 2016 campaign. The >president's son issued a second statement that, in part, read: [T]he woman >stated that she had information that individuals connected to Russia were >funding the Democratic National Committee and supporting Mrs. Clinton, Trump >Jr.s statement read. Her statements were vague, ambiguous and made no sense. > No details or supporting information was provided or even offered. The NYT article is not the Mueller report. Nor is it any kind of investigation. It is simply a newspaper article. Nothing more, nothing less. Journalists slant their stories in order to appeal to a particular audience. Editors oversee those stories and decide which ones, or how much of an article, to publish. >LL>Are you okay with a racist president, Republicans? >LL>I'm not. And most Americans aren't either. I condemn >LL>his words of hate, as should everybody. Regardless of >LL>political affiliation (or non-affiliation). > >In my opinion this entire thing is being blown out of proportion. Of course it is. That is why it is called politics. But it does not change the facts. The president said what he said. And what he said was clearly racist. >Why? because they are using 'this issue' as just another means to go after > Trump, mark my words it will backfire on them... Most women and independents are appalled by the president's choice of words. So it is not really a question of party affiliation, or even about personalities. What the president said was objectionable to many people, especially women and people of color, but also others. >You got it all wrong, The President said nothing wrong what so ever. Racism has no place in this country. When a president makes racist comments, he/she will be called out on it. As Trump found out the hard way. >or > >Did you forget what the so called Squad as said repeatedly w/ their >anti-American & anti-Semitic comments. There is no doubt in my mind that the > President loves this country deeply, it is why he ran for office. I do not care if all four of those women are full-blown socialists and hold beliefs you and others might not agree with. They are all women and people of color, as well as being US citizens. That makes them as American as you and me. What the president said about them was vile, mean, and hateful. He should be ashamed of himself, as well as others who continue to support him. He has never apologized, and I doubt he ever will. George Wallace was also a racist. A white racist who gave speeches written by a member of the Ku Klux Klan. Although he never uttered the "N" word in public, his use of a wink and a nod said it all. But at least George Wallace apologized for his antics. And went on to serve a fourth term as governor of the state of Alabama. Will black folks and people of color forgive President Trump for his antics, as they did George Wallace? I am sure Kanye West already has, even without an apology. But I doubt anybody else will. >What he said was not racist in any way, as he did not call them name or call > out their race signally or as group. Just because George Wallace never said the "N" word in public does not mean he was not a racist. His policies certainly reflect who he really was. Just as Trump's policies reflect who he really is. A bona fide racist. >What is very clear is that repeated statements each member of the squad show > very clearly that they have no love or respect for America. In America, people have the freedom to think whatever they want. In America, people have the freedom to express whatever they want. In America, people have the freedom to believe whatever they want. That does not mean that racism has any place in this country. There is absolutely no excuse for what the president said. None whatsoever. I do not agree with everything that anybody says, much less a member of Congress. And these four women are all US citizens, with the same rights as you and me. The president clearly singled them out because they are black, or people of color. He is playing to a crowd of white people, who believe in him as their god. As such, he can do no wrong, as he is the one who will grant them salvation from the evils that are before them. >Personally I do not believe these any of these 4 women represent anything > American, their views are anti-Semitic and are infact >inline more with Palestinian views. Everyone deserves to be treated with human dignity, regardless of the color of their skin. That is why racism has no part in this country. It is not who we are, or what we stand for. As such, we should all condemn the racist words spoken by a racist president. Because that is exactly what they are. Racist. >Want more proof. >Rashida Tlaib is Still Posing in Photos With Alleged Anti-Semite and > Fundraiser >Abdel-qader >https://www.mrctv.org/blog/rashida-tlaib-pose... > >Jihad Rep. Rashida Tlaib's Big Lie: Falsely Claims Palestinians Gave Jews a >Safe Haven After Holocaust >https://freedomoutpost.com/jihad-rep-rashida-... e >stinians-gave-jews-safe-haven-after-holocaust/ > >You want to let these 4 rip the country apart over nasty comments that >are clearly are not American. > >Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez >Ilhan Omar >Ayanna Pressley >Rashida Tlaib All four women are US citizens. As American as you and me. Whether one agrees, or disagrees, with their views is irrelevant. What the president said about them is clearly racist. We should all condemn him for his racist comments. >To be honest they are not worth it, No they do not need to home. >They the need to rocketed into space and straight into the Sun. Nobody is saying that you, or anybody else, has to agree with a single word they say. The president was wrong, and should at the very least apologize for his racist comments. He has already been condemned by the House of Representatives as a racist president, so he might as well. And then shut up and hope it all goes away. >No one can forget (you might want to) - or claim she never said that, but it >is true. Impeach the motherf*cker comments made by the nasty bit*h Rashida >Tlaib when her job was only hours new. > > https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/07/ten-qu... > Well, he is a motherf*cker as he remains married to the mother of one of his kids. Assuming the two of them sleep in the same bedroom (some Europeans claim they have separate quarters). >Clearly the Dems, want to turn this into impeaching party. Not really. One Democrat got carried away and introduced articles of impeachment based on the president's tweets. But that effort did not go too well with other Democrats and it was tabled with no vote taken on the matter. This was his third try to get Trump removed from office, without success. >It's simple folks if these nasty bit*hes didn't open their freakin mouths > then we would not be here right now! If the president had not made those racist comments then he would not be in the fine mess he is in now. >(You don't get to say these nasty Un-American when you work for the > Government and not expect a reaction from the President of the United > States. Vladimir Putin had members of Pussy Riot put in prison for what they said about him. Do we want the POTUS putting American citizens in prison because he does not like what they say about him? >I recently sent a tweet of my own. >"@SpeakerPelosi @realDonaldTrump This squad will turn the Democratic Party >into a circus, worse then ever b4 Very hateful anti-American, & anti-Semitic >comments. Mr. Trump is correct, They don't love our Country! >We who are, Patriots stand with you, Mr. President Like a Rock!!" Who cares if an American citizen does not love his/her own country? It is his/her right to freely express themselves, even if that speech is very offensive to some, or to all. Racism has no part in this country. When a president makes such vile comments, he/she will be called out on it. As Trump found out. >LL>Encouraging Germany to make a deal to buy natural gas from Russia >LL>has certainly made America great again. Not only will Germany be >LL>dependent on Russia for natural gas, but so will the rest of Europe, >LL>as those countries will be dependent on Germany to deliver the same >LL>natural gas it gets from Russia. See how that works? > >Wrong Again- you got this ass backwards. After Germany and Russia made a deal to build a natural gas pipeline, Trump criticized Germany for not agreeing to buy natural gas from the US. As if Trump had ever offered Germany any kind of deal. >Donald Trump suggested to the German Chancellor, that he thought that it was > a bad idea, because of being dependent to Russia. It is a bad idea. And worse, when you think it out further. Which explains why England chose Brexit over the EU. With Germany dependent on Russia for keeping their houses warm in winter, and the rest of Europe dependent on Germany for keeping their houses warm in winter, what do you think will happen when Russia turns off the tap to Germany? Lights out in Ukraine, hello Russian soldiers. Lights out in Poland, hello Russian soldiers. Lights out in the Baltics, hello Russian soldiers. Just like old times. >LL>The Chinese have a saying - >LL>"There can only be one sun that rules the sky." >Similar to the Japanese - The sun will never set upon the Empire. Right now, the US is the sun that rules the sky. China wants to become the new sun that rules the sky. "There can be only one!" ~from Highlander --Lee -- Change Is Cumming --- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb * Origin: - nntp://rbb.fidonet.fi - Lake Ylo - Finland - (2:221/360) |
||||||
|
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Politics Unlimited <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
Execution Time: 0.1033 seconds If you experience any problems with this website or need help, contact the webmaster. VADV-PHP Copyright © 2002-2024 Steve Winn, Aspect Technologies. All Rights Reserved. Virtual Advanced Copyright © 1995-1997 Roland De Graaf. |