On 2019 Jul 15 07:10:32, you wrote to Dale Shipp:

 DS>> It is not worth the effort to attempt to reason with you anymore.  It
 DS>> is clear that you have not read the elements of obstruction of
 DS>> justice that Mueller stated against Trump.

 GD> I guess we will have to return to the old ways, of agreeing to
 GD> disagree. With me being on the right, I can a achieve this quite
 GD> effectively.

with you being in the wrong, it is also achieved quite easily... that you
cannot accept that is very telling...

 DS>> It is clear that you do not understand how Barr is doing exactly what
 DS>> Trump is directing him to do, i.e. working as Trump's lawyer and not
 DS>> the people's lawyer.  There are carefully laid out rules about how
 DS>> the Whitehouse is not supposed to communicate with the Justice
 DS>> department except through particular channels -- and those channels
 DS>> do not include Trump telling Barr what to do, but that is what is
 DS>> happening.

 GD> Don't you listen to your boss or used to listen to your boss if you
 GD> are now retired. Anyway what I referring to is known as chain of
 GD> command and it happens everyday in every line of work. This is
 GD> something that is not indigenous to The White House. It's called
 GD> getting things done.

trump is -=*/NOT/*=- barr's boss... the DOJ is a separate and distinct
branch... you should be old enough to know how the US government is set up and
operates...

 GD> The Democrats are not use to a Republican President who will not

trump is not a republican president... he is only wearing that classification
like wearing dirty underwear...

 DS>> The opinions you are spouting are so close to those issued by the far
 DS>> right news outlets,

 GD> It's funny that you mention this, I was just explaining to my wife the
 GD> other day of what happens when I see news headlines on the internet. I
 GD> always be sure to look for the outlet of where the story originated;
 GD> If the the story is from New York Times or the Washington Post, there
 GD> are many that are biased.

without a doubt, every single one of them is biased... even your right-wing
ones...

 GD> It has been seen time and time again that they don't give the truth at
 GD> least not immediately it is buried within several paragraphs.

the right-wing ones do the same thing...

 GD> Left leaning newspapers have printed more stories that force them to
 GD> also print a statement of retraction. They also use from anonymous
 GD> sources more times than I care to remember, which are nothing more
 GD> then baseless statements that is not worth the paper that it's printed
 GD> on.

open your eyes, man... the right-wingers are equally biased and bad...

)\/(ark

And to this end they built themselves a stupendous super-computer which was
so amazingly intelligent that even before its data banks had been connected
up it had started from "I think therefore I am" and got as far as deducing
the existence of rice pudding and income tax before anyone managed to turn
it off.
... It is twice as hard to crush a half-truth as it is a whole lie.
---
 * Origin:  (1:3634/12.73)