Message Area
Casually read the BBS message area using an easy to use interface. Messages are categorized exactly like they are on the BBS. You may post new messages or reply to existing messages! You are not logged in. Login here for full access privileges. |
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Politics Unlimited <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
|
||||||
From | To | Subject | Date/Time | |||
Gregory Deyss | Dale Shipp | Re: Impeachment or not |
June 10, 2019 6:52 AM * |
|||
On 10 Jun 2019, Dale Shipp said the following... DS> -=> On 06-09-19 12:12, Gregory Deyss <=- DS> -=> spoke to Lee Lofaso about Re: Insults <=- DS> DS> GD> This is a hunger and a thirst that drives the left into making false DS> GD> claims and accusations without any merit about the President. DS> DS> GD> Their statements are outrageous as they also treasonous. DS> GD> Nasty Nancy saying that DS> GD> "I do not want to see the President impeached, I want to see him in DS> GD> Prison." DS> DS> You need to examine that quote in the context and circumstances in which DS> it was made. It does not matter what the circumstances were, there is no excuse for this to be spoken in any context. DS> DS> To start with, for the House to impeach Trump would result in nothing of DS> value to the Democrats. The fact is that the Republican Senate would DS> never convict Trump, and so in the end nothing would be accomplished. DS> DS> What she is saying is that she would rather focus on having Trump not be DS> elected to a second term. If and When that happens, he would then be DS> subject to indictment and trial on the multiple instances of obstruction DS> of Justice that Mueller documented -- with evidence. It is possible DS> that he would be convicted and thus end up in prison. That is a real DS> punishment for the crimes he has committed. That's arrogant presumption on her part, it's not up to her. (if the President is re-elected or not) she is only 1 vote and we already know that Nancy, nor her followers - on which direction that their vote will be cast. How can there be any impeachment or any indictment when there was no crime? To spite whatever back door Robert Mueller wants to leave open. The investigation is completed and so is the opportunity for an encore. There is no possibility of prison when there is no crime. As for his chances on being re-elected, I would say the following, they are dam good, the country is doing much better then when Obama was re-elected for a second term. However, what is it from your perspective that the President is guilty of? I really want you to think about that. First let me enlighten you on what it can't be. The firing of James Comey, The FBI Director serves at the word of the President of which is (or was in this case) his boss. Which means there was no crime committed with his firing. It can not be the Russian dossier, this was completely made up (more like a rough draft of a chapter from the book fifty shades of grey.) There was no "proven" collusion or obstruction. Again if there is no crime, then there can not be any indictment or impeachment. --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A43 2019/03/03 (Windows/64) * Origin: Capital Station BBS * telnet://csbbs.dyndns.org * (1:267/150) |
||||||
|
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Politics Unlimited <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
Execution Time: 0.0994 seconds If you experience any problems with this website or need help, contact the webmaster. VADV-PHP Copyright © 2002-2024 Steve Winn, Aspect Technologies. All Rights Reserved. Virtual Advanced Copyright © 1995-1997 Roland De Graaf. |