Message Area
Casually read the BBS message area using an easy to use interface. Messages are categorized exactly like they are on the BBS. You may post new messages or reply to existing messages! You are not logged in. Login here for full access privileges. |
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Politics Unlimited <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
|
||||||
From | To | Subject | Date/Time | |||
Gregory Deyss | Dale Shipp | Re: Well said, Mr. President |
May 23, 2019 7:30 AM * |
|||
DS> Actually most of them were either non political or replublicans. Yeah sure, non-political I do not believe that. If there is to be any truth to what your suggesting, then why did these folks made campaign donations to Hillary.. Which means they were political. DS> DS> GD> I do not blame the man, for pulling back slightly from infrastructure. DS> DS> He did not pull back slightly -- he stomped out and said -- play my way DS> or I won't participate. The truth of the matter is was agreed upon that they would meet, as they did have this meeting pre-planned. However what is also true is that Nancy Pelosi called a meeting of her own before she lerch (Charles Schummer) were to meet the President. It was at this tea party of a meeting that Nancy was calling for the Presidents head and still harping and scheming to impeach the President. If someone does that, before a meeting that talks about infrastructure, does that sound like someone that is serious wanting to make a impact on the matter. What this shows and is clear, is that Nancy Pelosi wants to undermine the President and try not to allow the President or his administration to be successful. DS> DS> GD> They tried to get him with phony dossiers. DS> DS> Do you mean that dossier that has been mostly substatiated, and which DS> has non of its claims dis-proven? It has been known for quite quite sometime now that the dossier was totally and completely made up. None of it is remotely true, not even slightly. DS> GD> years of wasted time and money it was determined that there was NO DS> GD> Collusion and NO Obstruction, and yet they will not yield, for their DS> It was not determined that there was no obstruction -- Mueller's report DS> documented evidence of at least ten instances for which Trump would have DS> been charged if he were not a sitting President. It also says within the 400+ pages there was No Collusion and No Obstruction - perhaps you read it. DS> They will work with him when he comes back to the table, instead of DS> sulking out to the Rose Garden to deliver a political speech. Did you watch his speech? His remarks where to the point and clear. --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A43 2019/03/03 (Windows/64) * Origin: Capital Station BBS * telnet://csbbs.dyndns.org * (1:267/150) |
||||||
|
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Politics Unlimited <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
Execution Time: 0.0843 seconds If you experience any problems with this website or need help, contact the webmaster. VADV-PHP Copyright © 2002-2024 Steve Winn, Aspect Technologies. All Rights Reserved. Virtual Advanced Copyright © 1995-1997 Roland De Graaf. |