Hi! Anton Shepelev -> Alexander Koryagin!
I read your message from 18.06.2018 18:56

 AK>> I prone to think that it was an accurate article title
 AK>> "Trump's 2019 budget".

Ah, "I am prone to think". Although, recently, somebody told me here that "to
be" could be omitted when things are clear without it. ;-)

 AS> There is no verb "to prone" (unless you have just invented
 AS> it).  I tend to think, or incline to the opiniton that...

It is also correct, I think.

 AK>> The book was not about 2019 budget -- I think the
 AK>> correct title (both for article and the book) could have
 AK>> been "How to plan an American budget effectively".

 AS> I fear you cannot call a budget project a book :-)

Have you seen the book photograph at the URL I provided? (no "to be" again
before "provided".

 AK>> Indeed, "2019 year" was an invention of the journalist.
 AS> No, not at all.  It is the proposed budget specifically for
 AS> 2019.

;-) IN this case it should have been "It is _a_ proposed budget specifically
for 2019". Probably, because they can have another budget draft, for instance
from the Congress.

Bye, Anton!
Alexander Koryagin
ENGLISH_TUTOR 2018

--- Paul's Win98SE VirtualBox
 * Origin: Quinn's Post - Maryborough, Queensland, OZ (3:640/384)