Hello Anatoliy.

29 Mar 12 20:21, you wrote to alexander koryagin:

ak>> BTW, below there are two quoting variants. From your opinion - are
ak>> they both correct? If yes, which one is better?

AK> The first one is better for GUI editors like mine, the second one is
AK> better for text mode editors (80x25) like GoldEd or I don't know what
AK> people use in DOS (does anyone use DOS anyway?). If you need a
AK> screenshot, I've uploaded it here:
AK> http://savepic.su/1676611.htm

AK> You can see that the first version fills the whole screen while the
AK> second version uses less than 2/3 of the screen. The readability is
AK> fine in both versions.

My GoldED+ reformats the first version to fit the terminal's line length for 
display.  Also it appears to reformat messages to fit the width of 80
characters or less before running an external editor.  I am not sure what
happens after GoldED+ receives the result from the editor -- it seems that you
are better off not mixing long and short lines during multiple edits, or GoldED
will be confused concatenating them; the editor receives a long line split into
multiple lines, but GoldED may combine them (not other lines?!) later, despite 
what it looks like in the editor.  The result is a mess.

Of course, it may all depend on any of the numerous settings of GoldED+, which
have no "modified" indicators (apparently my golded.cfg is based on one I used
in 2006).


Aleksej

--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5--b20110320
 * Origin:  (2:5020/1042.42)