Hello alexander!
30.03.2012 15:01:13, alexander koryagin wrote to Anatoliy Kovalenko:

ak> But I strongly doubt that you always make your windows so wide to be able
to write 120 symbol lines. It means that you usually set a reasonable width for
 your window, and you see lines that are hardly longer than 80 symbols. I think
 it can be explained by the fact that 60-80 symbols width is the most
comfortable width for the text. We used it in books and etc.
ak>
ak> In short I've made a conclusion that it is not my text was 2/3 of your
window -- it is your window was 1/3 wider than necessary. ;=)

No, I use an old notebook with 1280x800 pixel resolution and always read texts
in full screen (as seen on the screenshot). What's the use for me to reduce the
 window to 1/2 screen or less? I believe you don't resize MS WORD window to a
column size of 1/2-1/3 of screen when you type text, do you? I think the more
text you see at once, the better. Modern computers have even hgher resolution
screens, so formatting the text to 60 characters may become really annoying
because it will look as a tiny column, and all the rest screen space will be
left unused.


Bye, Anatoliy.
--- FTNed 2001 Build 0058-RC6/Windows NT 6.1
 * Origin: http://www.acritum.com (2:5020/1042.46)