Message Area
Casually read the BBS message area using an easy to use interface. Messages are categorized exactly like they are on the BBS. You may post new messages or reply to existing messages! You are not logged in. Login here for full access privileges. |
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to National Weather Network <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
|
||||||
From | To | Subject | Date/Time | |||
COD Weather Processor | wx-storm | HVYRAIN: Excessive Rainfall Discussion |
July 30, 2019 9:19 AM * |
|||
This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1564478374-118394-2076 Content-Type: text/plain FOUS30 KWBC 300919 QPFERD Excessive Rainfall Discussion NWS Weather Prediction Center College Park MD 518 AM EDT Tue Jul 30 2019 Day 1 Valid 12Z Tue Jul 30 2019 - 12Z Wed Jul 31 2019 ...THERE IS A SLIGHT RISK OF EXCESSIVE RAINFALL ACROSS PORTIONS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA AND FAR SOUTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO... ...Southwest... Mid-level ridge centered east of the 4 Corners Region will remain nearly stationary through the day 1 period (12Z Wed), thereby continuing to drive monsoon moisture into the Southwest. Meanwhile, a mesoscale/convectively aided vort max over northwest Mexico south early this morning continue to revolve around the closed mid/upper high, tracking up along the eastern Gulf of California and toward southwest AZ by 12Z Wed. PWATs as high 2+" will pool near the Mexico/AZ border, which is near 3 standard deviations above the climo mean, before advecting northward in response to persisting low/mid level southerly flow along with the aforementioned shortwave rotating around the periphery of the ridge. Across southern and central AZ, and upgrade to a Slight Risk was made in large part to the uptick in both areal-average QPF along with HREF/experimental HREF probabilities of >1"/hr rainfall rates. While not over the same area, all the high-res CAMs indicate scattered areas with max 1 hour rainfall rates of 1.5-2.5+ inches, which given the soils (peculation vs. runoff rates) and low FFG, would lead to the possibility of more scattered vs. isolated flash flooding. The other area of concern would be across far southeastern CA and southern NV. Areal-average QPF is quite low over this region, however given the pooling of greater deep-layer instability on the western periphery of the deeper cloud canopy, expect an isolated flash flood risk to branch out a bit farther west-northwest than the latest guidance would suggest. ...Western-Central Gulf Coast northeast through the TN and OH Valleys, Appalachians, Lower Great Lakes, and interior portions of the upper Mid Atlantic and Northeast... A broad Marginal Risk was noted ahead of the slow-moving upper trough/surface cold front. Thermodynamics are rather modest -- with PWs of 1.5-1.75" north and near 2.00" south not really anomalous for this time of year. MUCAPEs between 2000-3000 j/kg from the Gulf Coast through TN Valley would support more intense rainfall rates, as evidenced by the higher 1-2+ inch hourly rainfall probabilities per the HREF and experimental HREF. However, relatively weak low-level inflow/moisture flux into the frontal boundary, with 0-6km bulk shear values largely under 25 kts, would imply productive cold pools/outflow boundaries and thus limit the duration of the more intense rainfall rates. As such would expect a more localized excessive rainfall/flash flood risk, though the most likely area for a more organized heavy rainfall threat over the southern portion of the current Marginal Risk area would be across LA per a multi-CAM blend. However, even in this area, there's still quite a bit of model spread with the heavier totals. Farther north (OH Valley-upper Mid Atlantic and areas north), deep-layer instability will not be as robust (MUCAPEs averaging 1000-1500 j/kg); however, stronger forcing ahead of the upper trough (enhanced upper divergence and low-level frontogenesis via the right entrance region of the broad upper jet streak) will nevertheless foster widespread, organized pre-frontal convection, especially with the orographic enhancement on the western slopes of the Appalachians. Nevertheless, modest at best low-level moisture transport along with weak mid-level lapse rates will limit the risk of sustained, prolonged heavy rainfall. Hurley Day 2 Valid 12Z Wed Jul 31 2019 - 12Z Thu Aug 01 2019 ...THERE IS A SLIGHT RISK OF EXCESSIVE RAINFALL OVER PORTIONS OF ARIZONA AND UTAH... ...Four Corners area... Monsoonal flow affects a large area across the Four Corners area during Day 2, as the mid level ridging moves slowly east. The low to mid level southerly flow on the back side of the ridge sends deep moisture across AZ/southeast CA into portions of southern NV/UT and CO. The main thrust of moisture remains across southwest AZ into far southeast CA, where precipitable water values reach near 2.00 inches (which is between two and three standard deviations above the mean). Convection could be ongoing across portions of southwest AZ at the start of Day 2, as there is some indication of short wave energy (or perhaps an MCV) tracking from Mexico into this area early in the period. Any remaining convective clusters should be moving through western AZ, following the ribbon of best moisture before 31/18z. Outside of this, forcing could be lacking across Southern AZ into southeast CA during the period. Instability is expected to peak between 1000/2000 J/KG of MLCAPE before 01/00z, though convection may be unfocused outside of the presence of forcing. The deep moisture could support hourly rainfall amounts near an inch, mainly where training occurs. The short wave energy or old MCV is expected to track north across western AZ into southern and central UT, mainly between 31/18z and 01/00z. The mid level lift is expected to interact with the deep moisture plume (where precipitable water values are between two and three standard deviations above the mean), resulting in at least scattered storms. There is a multi high resolution model signal (led by the 00z NAM CONUS Nest) for hourly rainfall rates near 1.25 inches over much of northern AZ into southern and central UT, mainly before 01/00z. The main forecast problem could be instability. Cloudiness in the deep moisture (and ahead of the mid level support) could at least delay the recovery of instability, especially before 31/18z. Most models show 1000 J/KG of MLCAPE developing before peak heating in these areas, and that should be more than sufficient for convective initiation, particularly over the higher terrain. Even in the presence of mid level lift, the areal extent of convection could be muted by instability, which would lessen the flash flood threat to some degree. However, the depth of the moisture and the potential for enhanced lift could compensate for the lack of more widespread instability. With this in mind, a Slight Risk was placed over northwest AZ into southern and central UT, and this was collaborated with WFOs (FGZ/VEF/SLC). ...Central Plains into the Mid Mississippi Valley... Short wave energy riding over mid level ridging over the central Plains interacts with deepening moisture and instability to support the development of a convective cluster or small MCS on the nose of a low level jet across portions of NE/KS/MO during the second half of Day 2. A 30/35 knot low level southerly inflow across this area transports 2.00 inch precipitable water air (which is about two standard deviations above the mean) over the Central Plains, which becomes focused on a low level boundary extending across eastern NE into western MO, mainly after 01/00z. Strong 700/500 mb moisture transport across the Central Plans becomes focused on the front, supporting an increasing model signal for the development of a small MCS (an idea which is shown by 00z GFS simulated IR imagery) over southeast NE during this time window. The MCS then tracks across northeast KS into far western MO, along the axis of best instability on the nose of the low level jet late in the period. There is a window of opportunity for training along the south and west side of the storms before the system become more outflow driven after the development of a cold pool, which is expected to occur toward 01/12z. During this time, training in the deep moisture plume could support hourly rainfall amounts between 1.50/2.00 inches, especially where training occurs (an idea depicted by the 00z NAM CONUS Nest). Three hour flash flood guidance values are generally above 2.50 inches (though a portion of southeast NE has seen 300+ percent of normal rainfall over the past 7/14 days), so training would be needed for the initiation of flash flooding. Much of the 00z guidance (including much of the high resolution guidance) showed a fairly narrow axis of highest rainfall, with the 00z NAM showing amounts over 4.00 inches, so there could be some longitudinal spread here. However, the ingredients are expected to be in place, as well as good model agreement developing an MCS, so a Slight Risk was placed over northeast KS and western MO for Day 2 (which was collaborated with WFOs OAX/TOP/EAX/SGF). ...Northeast... A long wave trough crossing the Northeast during Day 2 begins to take on a negative tilt over Quebec, which allows a cold front crossing the Northeast to slow as it approaches the coast of Northern New England. Ahead of the front, a low level south southwest flow continues to feed 1.50/1.75 inch precipitable water air from the Mid Atlantic into Northern and Central New England, where model sounding showed 1000/2000 J/KG of MLCAPE in about the same location. The combination of moisture and instability is expected to support the development of at least scattered storms along and west of the Interstate 95 corridor in the afternoon and evening hours. Synoptic scale ascent associated with the mid level trough could aid in organizing the storms into clusters, and the shear could be sufficient to support convection maintenance. In the deep moisture plume, storms could produce hourly rainfall rates near 1.50 inches, as warm cloud heights are fairly high (based on 00z GFS model soundings), which could result in efficient rainfall makers. There is some regional/global support for local 2.00/3.00 inch rainfall amounts (especially where storms training in the low to mid level southwest flow). The most recent guidance has shifted the axis of highest rainfall further south across portions of eastern PA into northern NJ and the NYC Metro area, where the lowest flash flood guidance is located (as low as 1.50 inches in three hours). Based on the above, a Marginal Risk was stretched from northern NJ across much of interior New England for Day 2. Hayes Day 3 Valid 12Z Thu Aug 01 2019 - 12Z Fri Aug 02 2019 ...THERE IS A MARGINAL RISK OF EXCESSIVE RAINFALL FROM THE ROCKIES ACROSS THE CENTRAL PLAINS INTO THE MID MISSISSIPPI VALLEY...AS WELL AS A PORTION OF THE MID ATLANTIC... ...Rockies into the Central Plains and the Mid Mississippi Valley... Convection following an axis of instability and deepening moisture on a backing low level flow could feed clusters or a small MCS tracking from NE into western MO, mainly after 02/00z. A ribbon of 1000/1500 J/KG of MLCAPE (which become more elevated with time) on the edge of the mid level capping extends from SD across NE into western MO, which peaks between 02/00z and 02/06z. The instability should be sufficient for the development of storms on the axis, which track southeast with the mid level flow. There is some model support for short wave energy to track over the ridge position from the western Dakotas into the Mid MS Valley during the same time frame, which would allow the convective elements to become more organized with time. The low level flow backs TO the south and southeast ahead of the short wave (and the front boundary or surface trough across central KS), feeding 2.00 inch precipitable water air into the developing convection. Several regional/global models indicate the potential for an MCS to form on this axis, tracking across eastern KS/western MO before 02/12z. The airmass could support hourly rainfall amounts near 1.50 inches, especially on the southwest side of the MCS, where training is possible. Several regional/global models indicated the potential for 2.00/3.00 inch rainfall amounts (with the 00z NAM the most bullish with the rainfall), though there is some spread on where this occurs (which could be tied to the positioning of the mid level capping, which in turn influences the path of the convection). Three hour flash flood guidance is generally above 2.50 inches, but an MCS during late Day 2 could pre conditions the soil here. At this point, with some differences concerning the placement of the highest rainfall amounts, a Marginal Risk was placed over SD/NE into KS/IA/MO. If there is better agreement with the track of the storms, a Slight Risk could be needed here in later forecasts. ...Mid Atlantic... Deep moisture and instability pool along a frontal boundary across the Mid Atlantic states during Day 3. As the best mid level support for the frontal shears out to the north across New England, the front is expected to slow, and could become quasi stationary across portions of VA/NC after 01/18z. The moisture and instability should be sufficient to support at least scattered storms along and south of the front, where MLCAPE values are expected to range between 1500/2500 J/KG. Increasing warm cloud depths could allow storms to be fairly efficient rainfall makers, and given the 2.00+ inch precipitable water axis along the front should support storms capable of producing hourly rainfall rates near 2.00 inches, especially over far southern Va into much of central NC. Storm motions could be less than 10 knots, especially across western VA/western NC, which may foster an environment for short term training and cell mergers. A weak long wave trough extending from the Ohio Valley to the central Gulf Coast would result in steepening lapse rates, but overall, there may not be sufficient shear for cell maintenance. There is some regional/global model support for local 3.00 inch rainfall amounts, particularly where training occurs. Three hour flash flood guidance values are generally between 2.50/3.50 inches, and training in the higher moisture airmass could allow some locations to approach these values. Based on this, a Marginal Risk was placed over much of southern VA and NC for Day 2. Hayes Day 1 threat area: https://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/qpf/94epoints.t... Day 2 threat area: https://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/qpf/98epoints.t... Day 3 threat area: https://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/qpf/99epoints.t... $$ ------------=_1564478374-118394-2076 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT = = = To unsubscribe from WX-STORM and you already have a login, go to https://lists.illinois.edu and use the "Unsubscribe" link. Otherwise email Chris Novy at cnovy@cox.net and ask to be removed from WX-STORM. ------------=_1564478374-118394-2076-- --- SBBSecho 3.07-Linux * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105) |
||||||
|
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to National Weather Network <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
Execution Time: 0.0954 seconds If you experience any problems with this website or need help, contact the webmaster. VADV-PHP Copyright © 2002-2024 Steve Winn, Aspect Technologies. All Rights Reserved. Virtual Advanced Copyright © 1995-1997 Roland De Graaf. |