Hi! Tony,

On 07/26/2019 07:43 AM, you wrote to Nightfox:

 Ni>> I've seen newsgroups with messages addressed to specific names..  So
 Ni>> I'm not entirely sure what the limitation is there.  But I agree, I
 Ni>> don't think we should limit BBS messaging to the lowest common
 Ni>> denominator when we don't have to.

 TL> Were you reading them on Usenet?  Because I've never seen a To: name
 TL> in a newsgroup post when reading on Usenet (with a newsreader on a
 TL> NNTP server).  If it's gated, two possible sources are JAMNNTPd
 TL> (which can reconstruct a To field) or someone on a BBS replying to a
 TL> post on your side of the gateway.  And even if it's just on the one
 TL> BBS, JAMNNTPd will still work out the To address from anyone who
 TL> replies (technically in Usenet speak, posts a followup) there.

Much like this one.

BTW, there is a version of JamNNTPd that also does Msg & Squish messagebases as
 well as JAM.  None for SMB (Syncro), unfortunately.

Cheers,
Paul.

--- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
 * Origin: What are you looking down here for?  Read the message.
(3:640/1384.125)