Message Area
Casually read the BBS message area using an easy to use interface. Messages are categorized exactly like they are on the BBS. You may post new messages or reply to existing messages! You are not logged in. Login here for full access privileges. |
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Political Discussions <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
|
||||||
From | To | Subject | Date/Time | |||
Lee Lofaso | Gregory Deyss | Elizabeth Warren / Pocaho |
February 19, 2019 2:23 AM * |
|||
Hello Greg, [..] MP>> If she were a Republican, I would agree. Democrats and their voters do MP>> not usually care as much about bending or breaking the law when they MP>> choose a candidate to vote for. As long as she promises handouts she MP>> will get their votes. GD> I can not understand why democrats think the way they do, to me it's not GD> really thinking at all, but it is also UN-American. Republicans must do GD> everything they can to make Democrats less and less significant. Everything ought to be free. That is what everybody believes. Not just Democrats. Of course, it is always better when others pay for stuff rather than having to pay for it yourself. But really. We all want the same thing. You have to spend money to make money. Preferably other people's money. That is how to make it in this world. If you had to spend your own money you would never have enough to get what you want. You do understand how that works. The business of business is business. In order to remain in business, business must make a profit. Otherwise, that business will no longer be in business. Government is not a business. The business of government is to provide goods and services to the people. Why? Because government is the people. When those who are elected to serve in government use their positions to further enrich themselves, they are not doing the jobs they were elected/appointed to do. We own them, not the other way around. The current POTUS is using his position to further enrich himself. So are many members of Congress (both Democrats and Republicans). Even though this is unconstitutional, they all still do it. If there were no Democrats around, only Republicans would be doing it. If there were no Republicans around, only Democrats would be doing it. But human nature being what it is, every politician does it, regardless of party affiliation. What we need to do is get rid of money. That's right. Money is the root of all evils. We must learn how to live in a Star Trek world. A world devoid of money, so that no politician can get greedy. Even the greediest politician would not be able to get his/her hands on money because there would be no money to be had. See how that works? This would force everybody to share. Free college tuition. Free healthcare. Free food. Free housing. You name it. Since everything will be free, there would no longer be any need for political parties. Just as the Framers of the Constitution intended. Go ahead. Read the US Constitution. No mention is made of political parties. Since everything will be free, there also would be no need for banks. Why save money when there is no money to be had? Nobody saves money anyway, as most people spend it as soon as they get it. And no need for credit cards, either. No money means no credit. Just grab what you need and use it. GD> 1. Their policies of Free Stuff; GD> Free College is a term that 'used to be' clear enough to know what it meant. Louisiana has a free college tuition program known as TOPS. It is very popular. Georgia also has a free college tuition program. Why limit such wonderful free college tuition programs to two states? Much better to let everybody go to school for free, everywhere in the USA. The return on this investment is astronomical. By having a more educated workforce, business and industry would have the best people in the world working for them - all of them born in the USA. The taxes these people pay throughout their working days pays many times more for the free schooling they get. GD> (as always it still remains unclear, what band of 'others peoples money' GD> that they will pay for it) Of course those who receive free schooling pay for it. Many times over through the taxes they pay. Having better jobs due to having a quality education means higher pay. Higher pay means paying more taxes. Most people do not mind paying higher taxes if it means getting better pay. GD> Here in New York free college will soon take on a brand new meaning. GD> (I was assured by the executive chamber staff, that the Governor will sign GD> it.) That's good news. New York will finally join the ranks of Louisiana and Georgia. You should be proud of your governor for having the balls to sign such a fine piece of legislation. GD> If you are a illegal immigrant you will get free college. I wonder if this GD> will be the straw that broke the camels back and be too much for Democrats GD> to handle. Illegal immigrants are deported. Dreamers get to stay, at least for now. But they aren't residents of New York. So I find your assertion highly questionable. GD> It should be something to wake them up and turn them red from blue. Cuomo just beat the pants off his opposition, winning another term in office. His party also did nicely in the last election. GD> If *this* does not make them mad as a hornet - nothing will. The TOPS program is the most popular program Louisiana has ever enacted. Been on the books for decades. GD> I would think Cuomo is committing political suicide sealing his fate GD> assuring that he will never again win another term. Students, and their parents, will raise Cuomo's status to that of a living god. GD> * Are those grounds for impeachment & and is there such a thing on the GD> state level. or is that just a buzzword out taken out of the Democrat GD> playbook when there is a Republican President in The White House. Andrew Cuomo could use this legislation to launch his own bid for the White House. But I think he has something else in mind. If his candidate wins, he will be appointed to a position in the new administration, ready to take his turn after she retires. GD> 2. NYC must be removed to some degree, I am not suggesting that they be GD> granted statehood, just that ideals and values are to be separated from GD> Upstate NY. New Orleans is very different from the rest of Louisiana. That is why the only governor of Louisiana from New Orleans was the inept Dave Treen. Remember the governor on the TV sitcom "Benson"? That was Dave Treen. GD> (As they are vastly different from one another) NYC has burroughs. Louisiana has parishes. New Orleans is both a parish and a city. GD> However, it would not bother me if they were removed from NY to be granted GD> statehood. The Louisiana Purchase did not include the city of New Orleans. Read the document. The French has sold New Orleans to Spain before the US bought Louisiana from France. Spain never sold New Orleans to the US, but left when too many Americans flooded the city. Technically, one could say that New Orleans is a separate entity, not really part of Louisiana, or the USA. GD> It is the very reason why New York is a blue state, it's New York City. In GD> the Presidential election of 2016 every single county in New York was Red GD> for Donald Trump. NYC was blue. NY remained Blue. The electoral college votes in NY are based on popular votes throughout the entire state, not just one particular area. Nationally, if the electoral votes were based on how many counties went for one candidate versus another candidate, rather than votes, Trump would have won in a landslide. But the fact of the matter is Clinton beat the pants off of him by almost 3 million votes nationally. GD> 3. Cuomo's statement made on Jan 19, 2014 Gov. Cuomo: Pro-life, pro-gun GD> conservatives 'have no place' in New York. GD> I was born in Troy, New York of which is the forever home of Uncle Sam. Many of Cuomo's supporters are pro-life, pro-gun liberals. Some of them from Troy, NY. GD> His statement of 01/19/2014 is not ok with me. GD> * it has been repeated over and over again since then. Pro-life means from the moment of conception to the moment of natural death. How many people are truly pro-life based on that definition? First, you would have to rule out all those who are in favor of the death penalty ... GD> This is not ok with me, it makes my blood nearly come to a boil. Why? He was elected by the people of New York. He is the choice of the people. Maybe not your own personal choice, but the choice of all the people. GD> So much so, that I have looked into the qualifications for me to replace GD> him. First, you have to be old enough. Not necessarily mature. But old enough. Kind of like Donald Trump, who is also from NY. --Lee -- Your Hole Is Our Goal --- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb * Origin: news://eljaco.se (2:203/2) |
||||||
|
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Political Discussions <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
Execution Time: 0.0917 seconds If you experience any problems with this website or need help, contact the webmaster. VADV-PHP Copyright © 2002-2024 Steve Winn, Aspect Technologies. All Rights Reserved. Virtual Advanced Copyright © 1995-1997 Roland De Graaf. |