-=> Quoting Maurice Kinal to Nancy Backus on 07-Apr-2019 00:25 <=-

 NB>> Interestingly, in this packet I got this message twice... the
 NB>> first time with the 2025 date in the header (see the quote header
 NB>> above), and the second time with the actual date of 31Mar2019.

 MK> Interesting.  I am still waiting for it to arrive at the Brain along
 MK> wirh a couple other test netmails, with or without 'actual' dates,
 MK> whatever that really means.  The so-called 'actual' date of that
 MK> message was 2525 and the 2025 was the product of the two digit year
 MK> that the FTSC is so fond of.  Also noticed I am missing a couple other
 MK> messages that have nothing to do with me ... or you for that matter. 

I think your experiment might have messed up the message base at the bbs
I got that packet from... in trying to "fix" what it saw as a problem,
the extra message might have pushed the contents of all subsequent
messages to show up under the wrong message headers.... the sysop had to
purge the message base... and we had to figure out how to fix our last
read pointers to get our messages....

 NB>> (just a little late with working through the packets, as often
 NB>> the case)

 MK> Me too but in my case I delayed replying to this message in case the
 MK> original showed up as well as tweaking what is now the official
 MK> platform for messages following a specific path.  Looks like I found a
 MK> job for the raspberry pi thingy. 

I see you may have used the time wisely, then....   Or at least
profitably.... 

ttyl           neb

... I try to take one day at a time, but often several days attack at once

--- EzyBlueWave V3.00 01FB001F
 * Origin: Tiny's BBS - http://www.tinysbbs.com (1:229/452)
SEEN-BY: 123/1970 124/5013 5014 5015 5016 130/803 15/2 154/10 18/200 19/33
SEEN-BY: 203/0 221/0 226/17 229/1014 107 354 426 452 240/5832 249/206 317 400
SEEN-BY: 261/38 280/464 5003 310/31 317/3 31999/99 322/757 342/200 387/21
SEEN-BY: 393/68 396/45 423/120 633/280 770/1