Message Area
Casually read the BBS message area using an easy to use interface. Messages are categorized exactly like they are on the BBS. You may post new messages or reply to existing messages!

You are not logged in. Login here for full access privileges.

Previous Message | Next Message | Back to AMATEUR RADIO / HAM RADIO  <--  <--- Return to Home Page
   Networked Database  AMATEUR RADIO / HAM RADIO   [249 / 452] RSS
 From   To   Subject   Date/Time 
Message   Ed Vance    Jeff Smith   ARRL Requests Expanded HF   March 7, 2018
 11:01 AM *  

03-06-18 20:19 Jeff Smith wrote to Ed Vance about ARRL Requests Expanded HF
Howdy! Jeff,

 JS> @MSGID: <5A9F63DA.1780.amtradio@capitolcityonline.net>
 JS> Hello Ed,

 > You would know for sure.
 > Is the General and Technician Written Test the same?

 JS> I didn't think the General test was that much harder at all. The only
 JS> part that was a tad harder was memorizing the band plans and knowing
 JS> what frequencies went where, but that clicked eventually. Everything
 JS> else is basic electronic theory. The Technician license seemed to focus
 JS> on rules and regulations, while the General is more technology-based.

The General writen test back in 1959 had R&R, Electronics and Technology
in the 50 Multiple Choice Questions.

I'm thinking back then it took 74 per cent correct answers to pass the
written test.

I used the scratch paper provided with the test to mark the Question Number
on if I wasn't really sure of the answer I marked.

Or, if the question was a really hard one I would mark its number down so
I could go back to it after I had marked my answer for all of the other
test questions.

I sure didn't want the F.C.C. Examiner to see an unmarked question, which
He would put a Red Pencil Mark on.

Before going to the Exam I had figured out that I could miss 13 of the 50
Questions and still get my License upgraded to General.
So if I saw less than 13 numbers on my scratch paper I was sure that
I had passed the written portion.

But I would look again at the questions that I marked on my scratch paper
to see if maybe I needed to make a different choice than the one I had
marked on the test paper.

In 1959 the only Frequency Restrictions was for the Novice and Technician.

A General, Conditional, Advanced and Amateur Extra could operate A1 CW on
all of the Band(s) and A3 or A3a Voice on the upper portions of the Band(s).
Somewhere in the 10 Meter Band and above F3 Voice could be used (iirc).

I'll have to go look at my old A.R.R.L. License Manual to see how close I
was to what I wrote in my last paragraph.   Duh!

73 de Ed W9ODR .                    .


... I can't remember how long I've had amnesia.
--- MultiMail/MS-DOS v0.49
 * Origin: CCO BBS - capitolcityonline.net:26 (1:2320/105)
  Show ANSI Codes | Hide BBCodes | Show Color Codes | Hide Encoding | Hide HTML Tags | Show Routing
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to AMATEUR RADIO / HAM RADIO  <--  <--- Return to Home Page

VADV-PHP
Execution Time: 0.1127 seconds

If you experience any problems with this website or need help, contact the webmaster.
VADV-PHP Copyright © 2002-2024 Steve Winn, Aspect Technologies. All Rights Reserved.
Virtual Advanced Copyright © 1995-1997 Roland De Graaf.
v2.0.140505

Warning: Unknown: open(c:\Sessions\sess_v9bsqfbpvg4a39og38vba1uak3, O_RDWR) failed: No such file or directory (2) in Unknown on line 0 Warning: Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct (c:\Sessions) in Unknown on line 0 PHP Warning: session_start(): open(c:\Sessions\sess_v9bsqfbpvg4a39og38vba1uak3, O_RDWR) failed: No such file or directory (2) in D:\wc5\http\public\VADV\include\common.inc.php on line 45 PHP Warning: Unknown: open(c:\Sessions\sess_v9bsqfbpvg4a39og38vba1uak3, O_RDWR) failed: No such file or directory (2) in Unknown on line 0 PHP Warning: Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct (c:\Sessions) in Unknown on line 0