| 's VADV-PHP Home |
|
|
Message Area
Casually read the BBS message area using an easy to use interface. Messages are categorized exactly like they are on the BBS. You may post new messages or reply to existing messages! You are not logged in. Login here for full access privileges. |
| Previous Message | Next Message | Back to AMATEUR RADIO / HAM RADIO <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
|
||||||
| From | To | Subject | Date/Time | |||
|
Richard Menedetter | Bob Seaborn | ??? |
January 7, 2016 6:15 PM * |
||
Hello, Bob! 07 Jan 16 10:05, from Bob Seaborn -> Holger Granholm: BS> Well, I do also have a fusion and a dmr rig, but don't play with BS> them all that much. I do much prefer the audo quality of D-STAR. Really?? D-Star uses the older AMBE vocoder while DMR and Fusion use AMBE+2. Fusion can also use more Bandwidth for the Vocoder compared to D-Star and DMR. So D-Star should sound clearly worse than any other of the mentioned techniques. It should also be much more affected by the R2D2 effect (bad audio when you have high bit error rates). Than again I only have DMR and FM, so I cannot really compare. Best Regards, Richard --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5 * Origin: fido.ricsi.priv.at (2:310/31) |
||||||
|
||||||
AMATEUR RADIO / HAM RADIO 
| Previous Message | Next Message | Back to AMATEUR RADIO / HAM RADIO <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
Execution Time: 0.0811 seconds If you experience any problems with this website or need help, contact the webmaster. VADV-PHP Copyright © 2002-2024 Steve Winn, Aspect Technologies. All Rights Reserved. Virtual Advanced Copyright © 1995-1997 Roland De Graaf. |